• Users Online: 501
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 122-126

Staging and grading chronic viral hepatitis: A teaching hospital experience using an objective histological activity index in a tropical population


1 Department of Morbid Anatomy and Forensic Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Usmanu Danfodio University, Sokoto, Nigeria
2 Department of Pathology, Ahmadu Bello University and Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Kaduna, Nigeria

Date of Submission28-Jun-2017
Date of Acceptance09-Aug-2018
Date of Web Publication8-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
Usman Bello
Department of Morbid Anatomy and Forensic Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Usmanu Danfodio University, Sokoto
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/phmj.phmj_24_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) is the leading cause of chronic liver diseases (CLD) and exhibit diffuse parenchymal damage requiring a systematic assessment of disease extent and progression.
Aims: The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological pattern and grade/stage all cases of CVH using Ishaq Modified Histologic Activity Index (HAI); then share and to compare our experience with similar works elsewhere.
Methods: Ten years (2006–2015) liver biopsies received in the Department of Pathology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria, were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin and stained with routine and special stains were reviewed, graded and staged using Ishaq HAI. Data were analysed and presented in statistical frequency distribution tables and figures.
Results: CVH formed 55.2% was the most common of liver diseases. There were119 male and 47 female with male-to-female ratio of 2.5: 1 and peaked in the third decade of life. Nearly 42.2% had modified Ishaq HAI score of 4–8, while 28.3% and 27.1% had score 1–3 and score 9–12, respectively. Only 2.4% had score of 13–18. Nearly 70.5% of cases were between Stages 0 and 2, 25.9% of cases were Stage 3and 4 while only 6% were in Stage 5. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the most common aetiology and found in 77.7% of cases, 13.3% were associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HBV/HCV co infection in 9.0%.
Conclusions: CVH was the most common form of CLD, peaked in the third decade of life. Nearly 42.2% were in mild grade disease while 70.5% had Stage 2 and below disease. HBV infection was the most common aetiology.

Keywords: Grading, hepatitis B viral hepatitis, hepatitis C viral hepatitis, staging


How to cite this article:
Bello U, Iliyasu Y. Staging and grading chronic viral hepatitis: A teaching hospital experience using an objective histological activity index in a tropical population. Port Harcourt Med J 2018;12:122-6

How to cite this URL:
Bello U, Iliyasu Y. Staging and grading chronic viral hepatitis: A teaching hospital experience using an objective histological activity index in a tropical population. Port Harcourt Med J [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 18];12:122-6. Available from: http://www.phmj.org/text.asp?2018/12/3/122/253714




  Introduction Top


Viral hepatitis contributes significantly to the burden of liver diseases and over 2 billion living people have been infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) while over 350 million of them are chronically infected carriers with no significant liver disease.[1] Majority of these infected carriers will progress to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) thus representing a significant public health burden.[2] In Africa, at least 65 million people are chronically infected with HBV.[3] The seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in Nigeria ranged from 10% to 40%.[4]

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 170 million individuals were chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) globally with 75% developing chronic liver disease and of this 1.6% transformed to HCC.[5] Africa has the highest WHO estimated regional HCV prevalence of 5.3% while Egypt (17.5%) had the highest HCV prevalence worldwide.[6] The documented seroprevalence of hepatitis C viral antibody in Nigeria ranges between 4.5% and 5%.[4]

Liver biopsy has become central to the management of hepatic diseases despite being an invasive procedure and is widely used in clinical practice as the gold standard in assessing the nature and severity of liver diseases.[7] The first published qualitative classification of chronic hepatitis by an international group was in 1968 and codified terminologies such as chronic persistent hepatitis, chronic lobular hepatitis and chronic active hepatitis based on the degree of disease activity and to provide prognostic information and criteria for the use of immunosuppressive therapy.[8] Although these terminologies are currently obsolete, before this period, most hepatological examinations were descriptive and subjective that leads to interpretation discrepancies among clinicians.[9]

Objective Histological Activity Index (HAI) was established in 1981 by Knodell et al.[10] Subsequently, different modifications of the Knodell's (HAI) and scoring systems were introduced by Ishak,[11] Scheuer,[12] Batts-Ludwick,[13] and French METAVIR group[14] to ascertain the natural history, pathogenesis, correlate serological features and develop appropriate therapy for chronic hepatitis.[15] The advantage of these was to objectively enable statistical analysis of research result. Other international specialist bodies also brought some modifications such as World Congress of Gastroenterology, International Association for the Study of the Liver and the International Working Party.[16]

Determination of the grade of activity in chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) was based on important histologic features including level of portal infiltrate, interface hepatitis, lobular necrosis and confluent necrosis. The stage of the disease is determined by the level of fibrosis that usually commences as short fibrous septae from portal areas to bridging fibrosis and subsequent formation of incomplete or complete nodules.[17] While other systems use one or two of these histologic features in determining the grade/stage of the disease, the Ishak system combined all the parameters to determine the grade of activity and stage the disease.[11]

In tropical populations, we are confronted with a lot of challenges related to healthcare delivery such as other sectors of the economy, related to workforce, the technology and facility and especially the political will in developing healthcare sector. The aims of this analysis are to determine the epidemiological pattern of CVH in our centre, grade and stage all cases that have fulfilled the laid down criteria such as specimen length and number of portal tracts using the Ishaq Modified HAI; then share and compare our experience with similar works elsewhere.


  Methods Top


This is a 10-year analysis of all the liver biopsies submitted to the Department of Pathology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital (ABUTH) Shika-Zaria, between 2006 and 2015. Tissues were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin and stained with haematoxylin and eosin and special stains which were routinely used for all our liver biopsies including Masson's trichrome, reticulin, periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) with and without diastase digestion, Perls and Shikata orcein.

PAS was used to demonstrate the presence of mucin, extent of hepatocyte loss in the grading of necroinflammatory activity. Reticulin stain demonstrates Type III collagen and Masson trichrome stain demonstrates Type I collagen fibres, these highlight hepatic plate architecture and thin layers of these connective tissues and were used for accurate assessment of structural changes and grading fibrosis. Orcein stain was employed to demonstrate HBsAg material within hepatocytes while Perls' stain was used to highlights stainable iron to rule out the cases of haemochromatosis.

Patients' biodata, including age, sex, duration of symptoms, were extracted from the accompanying case cards and in some cases from patients' case folder. Other information on viral load and activity was also extracted from case cards.

Detailed histologic features were reviewed by all the authors and cases were graded and staged according to Ishak modified HAI;[11] the scores were categorised according to Desmet[18] interpretation as minimal (1–3), mild (4–8), moderate (9–12) and severe (13–18) diseases. Other features such as HBV viral cytoplasmic particles and lymphoid aggregates and steatosis associated with HCV hepatitis were also noted. Alcoholic liver disease was excluded using history of significant alcohol consumption and histologic features such as Mallory hyaline bodies and megamitochondria. Collected data were analysed using summary statistics and presented in frequency distribution tables and figures. Ethical clearance for the study has been obtained from the Ethics and Scientific Committee of the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Shika-Zaria.


  Results Top


Three hundred and one liver biopsy specimens were received during the study and of these 166 cases (55.2%) were of CVH. There were 119 male and 47 female with a male-to-female ratio of 2.5:1. Their ages ranged from nine to 62 years and peaked in the third decade of life. Up to 82.5% of cases were between ages of 21 years to 50 years [Figure 1]. One hundred and forty-three cases (84.2%) were of chronic HBV infection, 8.4% (14 cases) were of HCV and 5.4% (9 cases) were due to co-infection with HBV and HCV.
Figure 1: Line graph showing age distribution of cases of chronic viral hepatitis in the study

Click here to view


[Table 1] shows a review of previous qualitative diagnoses and corresponding disease grade. Overall, forty-seven cases (28.3%) had modified Ishaq HAI score of between 0 and 3 (minimal disease), 70 cases (42.2%) were mild grade disease, 45 cases (27.1%) were moderate-grade disease and 2.4% of cases only had severe grade disease [Figure 2]. The stages of disease progression is presented in [Table 2] and showed that bulk of cases (70.5%) were between Stages 0and 2 and 25.9% of cases were Stages 3 and 4 while only 6% were in Stage 5.
Table 1: Chronic viral hepatitis review and grade Using the Ishaq Modified Histologic Activity Index

Click here to view
Figure 2: Histogram showing Grading of Chronic Viral Hepatitis Using Ishaq's Modified Histologic Activity Index

Click here to view
Table 2: Grading and staging of chronic viral hepatitis by sex using Ishaq Modified Histologic Activity Index

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


CVH was the predominant liver pathology in our settings affecting younger age groups predominantly male. Hence, many reasons to explain this trend; the high prevalence of HBV infection, higher rate of foetomaternal transmissions, the promiscuous behaviour of the young populations, the rising markets of traditional concoctions, improved awareness and accessibility to medical facilities. Similar reports from Nigeria show chronic hepatitis to predominate among different liver diseases. David et al, in their study of the safety of liver biopsy in the same center as the index study also reported chronic viral hepatitis as the predominant liver pathology.[19] Chronic viral hepatitis accounted for 55.2% of all the liver diseases recorded in this study. This is slightly higher though comparable to the frequency distribution of 40.5% and 45.7% respectively from Kano (north west) and Maiduguri (north east).[20],[21] In Jos, north central 31.7% was reported,[22] while the highest rate of 62.5% was reported by Ugiagbe et al in Benin, south-south Nigeria.[23] However, a study from Lagos (Southwest) documented lower rate of 17.7%.[24]

Majority (82.5%) of our cases were clinicopathologically due to hepatitis B viral infection. The carrier rate of HBsAg varies worldwide; from 0.1% to 0.2% in Britain, the United States of America and Scandinavia to 3% in Greece and southern Italy. In Africa and Far East, it ranges between 10% and 15%.[2] Higher rates are also documented in isolated communities of Alaskan Eskimos (45%) and Australian Aborigines (85%).[2] The HBV hepatitis is highly endemic in Africa with prevalence of 8% and at least 65 million people chronically infected.[3] The seroprevalence of HBsAg in Nigeria ranges from 10% to 40%.[6] In 2014, Mbaawuaga et al. reported a 12.0% seroprevalence of HBsAg in Northcentral Nigeria.[25] Musa et al. also studied 46 published articles in a 13 years systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of HBV infection in Nigeria and reported ranges of between 0.5% and 46.8% and a pooled prevalence of 13.6% among Nigerians.[26]

The CVH cases were reviewed based on Ishaq modified HAI, a comprehensive quantitative numerical assessment. One-hundred and seventeen cases (70.5%) had minimal and mild grade diseases with scores of 1–3 and 4–8, respectively according to Desmet,[18] also 70.5% of the cases had fibrosis score of 0–2, a non-progressive disease while only 3.6% had a score of 5 which is an advanced stage that may progress to cirrhosis. However, adequate treatment at this stage can still reverse the process with promising results.[27] Our finding is comparable to the report by Okafor and Olusegun in Ile-Ife whom in comparing the various systems of grading/ staging, used similar grading and staging criteria in their study of chronic viral hepatitis and documented 46% for minimal and 38% for mild grade diseases with respective scores of 1-3 and 4-8 and a fibrosis score of zero in 70% of cases). In that report only single case had Stage 5 disease.[28] Ananya et al. in their study of chronic HCV hepatitis reported that 60.5% of their cases had Ishaq HAI score of <8, a minimal to mild grade disease, 33.3% had fibrosis Stage 0–2 disease and 66.7% had fibrosis Stage 3.[29] Similarly, a prospective study of 344 cases of chronic HCV patients in Pakistan by Anwar et al., reported 54.9% patients with minimal to mild disease activity. In the later study, they also reported that 69.0% of their cases had Stage 0–2 disease,[30] a finding which is similar to 70.5% recorded in this study for Stage 0–2. Again only 8.7% of their patients were Stage 4 diseases. The finding of 70.5% for minimal to mild grade in this study also concur with reports from Brazil and Dhaka, Bangladesh by Atique et al. where they recorded 63% for Stages 0–2 though with wide disparity in the disease grades.[31],[32] The low rate of progression of disease in this study may be due to the fact that the majority of cases were HBV-associated chronic hepatitis with only few cases of HCV hepatitis. According to the WHO reports, 75% of adult infected with HCV progress to chronic disease while only 5.5%–10% of HBV-infected patients progress to chronic disease.[6] The fibrosis stage of CVH determined progression to cirrhosis and possible transformation to HCC, in our series 10.8% of cases had modified Ishaq HAI Stages 4–5 and these are likely to progress to cirrhosis with significant percentages transforming to HCC.

Grading and staging of liver biopsies are central to the management of patient with CVH though in most centres in the tropical settings is not routinely done. In the few centres, where this important aspect of hepatologic examinations is routinely undertaken, there seems to be no uniform system adopted. The new approach to histopathologic hepatic tissue examinations requires comment on aetiology, severity and distribution of necroinflammatory activity and degree of fibrosis. Aetiology in most cases cannot be determined on the basis of histological examinations alone; but combination of clinical features, serologic evidence as well as characteristics histopathologic findings. For grading and staging of chronic hepatitis biopsy specimen the minimum criteria include specimen length of at least 20-25mm long and 11 or more complete portal tracts avoiding supcapsular specimen as this may affect staging fibrosis. The specimen should be accompanied by complete, adequate and relevant clinical informations.

The most important challenges in evaluating hepatic biopsy specimen in most centres in developing nation including ours relates to specimen adequacy, fragmentations, lack of relevant clinical information, properly processed tissue with ancillary stains, number of pathologist and especially only few show interest in hepatopathology. The limitations of this study include inadequate quantity of tissues, some with <6 portal areas and fragmentation of the tissues. In addition, the study is hospital based; on selected patients attending the hospital and therefore cannot represent the generality of the populace.


  Conclusions Top


Grading and staging of liver biopsy specimen in chronic hepatitis are an integral part of the histopathologic interpretations. A standard reproducible system of grading and staging with clinical relevance in a particular locale should be adopted in reporting such specimen by the attending pathologist. This is eased by complete relevant clinical information from the gastroenterologist and or hepatologist.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Hepatitis B vaccines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2004;79:255-63.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sherlock S, Dooley J. Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis delta virus. Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System. 11th ed. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Co. p. 286-99.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Valente F, Lago BV, Castro CA, Almeida AJ, Gomes SA, Soares CC, et al. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of hepatitis B virus in Luanda, Angola. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2010;105:970-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Omolade A, Fred J, Abdulkareem FB, Olusegun O. The clinical laboratory and the diagnosis and management of chronic viral hepatitis. Ann Trop Pathol 2012;3:85-91.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zein N. The epidemiology and natural history of hepatitis C virus infection. Cleveland Clinic J Med 2003;70:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Karoney MJ, Siika AM. Hepatitis C virus infection in Africa: A review. Pan Afr Med J 2013;14:44.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Saleh HA, Abu-Rashed AH. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for evaluation of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2007;16:425-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Scheuer PJ. Liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis: 1968-78. Gut 1978;19:554-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hübscher SG. Histological grading and staging in chronic hepatitis: Clinical applications and problems. J Hepatol 1998;29:1015-22.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC, Chen TS, Craig R, Kaplowitz N, et al. Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology 1981;1:431-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 1995;22:696-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: A need for reassessment. J Hepatol 1991;13:372-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Batts KP, Ludwig J. Chronic hepatitis. An update on terminology and reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:1409-17.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The French METAVIR cooperative study group. Hepatology 1994;20:15-20.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Brunt EM. Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: The Knodell histology activity index and beyond. Hepatology 2000;31:241-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Terminology of chronic hepatitis, hepatic allograft rejection, and nodular lesions of the liver: Summary of recommendations developed by an international working party, supported by the world congresses of gastroenterology, Los Angeles, 1994. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:S177-81.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Goodman ZD. Grading and staging systems for inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 2007;47:598-607.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Desmet VJ. Milestones in liver disease; scoring chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 2003;38:382-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Samaila AA, Mohammed AZ, Borodo MM, Tijjani BM. Histopathological findings in liver biopsies and clinical correlation at Kano, Nigeria. Sahel Med J 2008;11:20-3.  Back to cited text no. 19
  [Full text]  
20.
Samuel DO, Oluleke IP, Omotara SM. Safety of liver biopsy as a day procedure in ABUTH Zaria, Nigeria. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012;22:675-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Laraba A, Wadzali G, Sunday B, Abdulfatai O, Fatai S. Hepatitis C virus infection in Nigerians with chronic liver disease. Int J Gastroenterol 2010;9:9-13. [doi: 10.5550/1775].  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Echejoh GO, Tanko NM, Manasseh AN, Mandong BM, Ogala-Echejoh SE, Ladep GN, et al. Clinicopathological correlation of liver biopsy in Jos, central Nigeria. Jeune Chambre Commer Montr 2007;10:557-62.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ugiagbe EE, Udoh MO. The histopathological pattern of liver biopsies at the university of Benin teaching hospital. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16:526-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
24.
Abdulkareem FB, Banjo AA, Elesha SO, Daramola AO. Histopathological study of liver diseases at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria (1989-2000). Niger Postgrad Med J 2006;13:41-65.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Mbaawuaga EM, Iroegbu CU, Ike AC. 2014 hepatitis B virus serological patterns in Benue State, Nigeria. Open J Med Microbiol 2014;4:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Musa BM, Bussell S, Borodo MM, Samaila AA, Femi OL. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in Nigeria, 2000-2013: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:163-72.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
27.
Hytiroglou P, Snover DC, Alves V, Balabaud C, Bhathal PS, Bioulac-Sage P, et al. Beyond “cirrhosis”: A proposal from the international liver pathology study group. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;137:5-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Okafor O, Ojo S. A comparative analysis of six current histological classification schemes and scoring systems used in chronic hepatitis reporting. Rev Esp Patol 2004;37:269-77.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Manuyakorn A, Tanwandee T, Atisook K. Pathologically different features and fibrosis scores in chronic hepatitis C genotypes 3 and 1. J Med Assoc Thai 2007;90:1123-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Anwar AA, Khaliqul RS, Syed Qaiser HN, Mustafa K. Histopathological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis C patients in rural Sindh. J Liaquat Univ Med Health Sci 2009;8:121-5.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Silva GF, Nishimura NF, Coelho KI, Soares EC. Grading and staging chronic hepatitis C and its relation to genotypes and epidemiological factors in Brazilian blood donors. Braz J Infect Dis 2005;9:142-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Atiqur MD, Sultana RM. Degree of viraemia and liver histology in chronic hepatitis C. Anwer Khan Mod Med Coll J 2010;1:17-20.  Back to cited text no. 32
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed392    
    Printed47    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded74    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]